🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.