🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie is an cute small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – called “Onion” – is a big but guardian-like companion. Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian amusement park have become pawns in a struggle between a defunct facility, public officials and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the heated controversy over their destiny often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been thoroughly researched by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the national authorities blocked the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling attraction near Niagara Falls where they are kept threatened to put them down unless the authorities pays for the upkeep of their survival. The nation’s fisheries minister has refused that demand, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain situation.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Scientists say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, intellectual tasks and group interactions suggest they are deeply intelligent mammals – something one caretaker discovered first-hand.

She spent several years as a whale caretaker, a position that entailed earning the trust of the aquatic animals.

“Establishing those bonds over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of love. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so wonderful and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so astounded by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their characters. She cultivated a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting natures.

“One whale chose me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “Both changed the way I view bonding.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s interaction with the whales developed against a background of growing public opposition to their captivity.

During her tenure at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a toll which the park ascribes to age-related causes, but which campaigners say indicates the inadequate care in which they were kept.

The facility did not operate to the guests over the summer, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand results of the shutdown. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the tanks because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are inquisitive and so they grab fragments and move about with chunks in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not comment to a inquiry, but earlier asserted: “The whales … obtain far superior veterinary services and around the clock care than any individual in the Britain, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was terminated from the facility in recent months following the death of Eos, an ailing beluga the caretakers had to humanely kill. She said the park thought information of the death were leaked to the press and she was let go not long after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ outcome has left her and staff members in distress. She says the park’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “logistically impossible” endeavor, adding any efforts to put down even a individual beluga would require “considerable staff”, vehicles and specialized tools.

“It’s impossible in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess advocates for demands for the whales to be removed immediately from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official turned down a bid to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the application would have meant a continued existence in confinement and a return to public entertainment,” the minister stated. “As Canadians, we know that belugas should be in the wild, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in clear conscience permit an export that would perpetuate the situation these belugas have experienced.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s comments reveal a more general incorrect perception of the realities of life for belugas raised in confinement.

“The society needs to understand these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “The public just don’t realize that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers struggle to find a answer, ideas have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. An idea called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of nourishment for Indigenous peoples.

A suggested protected area in the province of eastern Canada, which has received regulatory clearance, has shown to be contentious. The future location, which includes 100 acres of protected cove, is not yet built. Proponents remain positive that it could eventually represent a long term answer for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ fate.

Some experts say the prospect of a refuge indicates a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a workable approach in the short term.

Charles Vinick, head of the sanctuary project, said the facility will simulate the cognitive activities and diet the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the well-being of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|